Smart Manufacturing is heralded to be the next industrial revolution; will small manufacturers benefit?
My next step was to speak with the performance management
software provider to find out how we might enable communication between the
client’s ERP and their software to allow more efficient workflow. This provider
caters to small-to-medium manufacturing organizations, and their response was
such data exchanges were not possible with their software. Theirs is very much
a point solution, and their client base was not asking for such capabilities. This
is an interesting conundrum: Smart Manufacturing is all about the connected
enterprise, yet smaller manufacturers (who comprise over 95% of the
marketplace) are not demanding the capabilities from their system providers which
make Smart Manufacturing possible!
Wise Up, Grow Up, Power Up
I can’t fault the solution providers; they will always give
their customers what they ask for. Solution providers are aware of industry
trends, but if features have no market demand they have no economic incentive
to include those features in their products. It is up to manufacturing
organizations themselves to stay abreast of the changing technology and how
they might leverage it to their own competitive advantage. Fortunately there
are industry organizations which can help with this; one example is MESA
International. In regards to Smart Manufacturing, MESA has a soon-to-be
released white paper entitled “Smart Manufacturing Demystified – The Landscape
Explained”. This paper was authored by industry thought leaders from companies
such as Rockwell Automation, IBM, ATS Global, PTC, iBASEt, Plex Systems, and
Efficient Plant, and will help manufacturers of any size familiarize themselves
with the concepts of Smart Manufacturing. Smaller manufacturers especially need
to take advantage of this information and incorporate it into their strategic
planning. Then they will be better informed when selecting system software, or
when pressing the suppliers of their existing systems for new capabilities.
Organizations of any size go through a system maturation
process – some even do it intentionally. MESA has modeled this as a four-stage growth sequence. At the initial stage, an organization exhibits
application-centric thinking: every problem needs its own application as part
of the solution. This has led to a proliferation of three & four letter
acronym solutions built around common industry problem sets. Do you have an
MES? How about a PLM? CMMS? EMI? SPC? QMS? At the next stage in the maturation
process, organizations begin to realize there are commonalities between these
applications, and begin implementing data governance and master data; they are
demonstrating data-centric thinking. Then comes a realization that these
applications cross organizational boundaries, and would be more valuable if
their capabilities could be combined in different ways via an enterprise
service bus. This stage promotes interface-centric thinking. At the apex of the
maturation sequence is process-centric thinking; the confluence of systems and
services to facilitate end-to-end process workflow. Studies at MIT’s Center for
Information Systems Research have shown that organizations moving from the
initial stage to the second stage reduce IT costs by 15%. Organizations which
mature from the second to third stage save an additional 10%. But something
interesting happens to organizations which grow into the fourth stage: IT
spending increases because those companies are finding a significant increase
in ROI and effectiveness. Smaller organizations often are not staffed to direct
this maturation process, which means it occurs more slowly. Many have yet to
transition from application-centric thought processes.
Another of the problems smaller manufacturers face is a lack
of leverage when it comes to industry solutions. Let’s face it, a company with
20 employees just doesn’t have the same clout as one with 20,000. It can be
hard for a small organization to get the attention of the providers. As in the
case of my potential client, just one customer asking for features which allow
better enterprise integration will not be enough for the solution provider to
invest in making the changes. Two forces will motivate solution providers: the
threat of clients switching to different suppliers and the ability to go after
new market prospects. For small manufacturers, switching costs for existing
point solutions are very likely high enough to preclude a serious threat to the
supplier. A small niche manufacturing entity also is unlikely to influence a
provider’s roadmap because of a narrow market, blunting that force as well. A
third force is required: user groups. User groups have long been a staple of
large software houses such as SAP, Microsoft, Autodesk, PTC, and Oracle. These groups
collaborate with the solution providers to help map the future state of their
products. Small manufacturers who wish to have a larger voice in the direction
their technology investments take should participate in user groups. If such a
group does not exist, it is easy enough to create one via social media
(meetup.com, for example).
If small-to-medium sized manufacturers wish to benefit from
the coming Smart Manufacturing revolution, they need to wise up by taking
advantage of the information available in the manufacturing community, grow up
intentionally through a directed maturation process, and power up through
collaboration with technology users who have common interests.
No comments:
Post a Comment